Archive for the ‘photography’ Tag

Canoe River Powerlines, Foxborough   Leave a comment

Here’s one link to the observations: https://www.inaturalist.org/calendar/gaurav1729/2025/5/26

Hemiptera

Harmostes:
Order Hemiptera
Suborder Heteroptera
Infraorder Pentatomomorpha
Superfamily Coreoidea
Family Rhopalidae
Subfamily Rhopalinae
Tribe Harmostini
Genus Harmostes

Amphigonalia cf gothica, looking like a Maori warrior. It was flinging honeydew, I wish I had taken better photos of the process.

the honeydew

There was a puddle, not even a pond, and a lone Notonecta (milky backswimmer). From my vantage point, the backswimmer was swimming in the reflection of an electrical powerline tower, and that made for some very nice patterns in the water.

Lepidoptera

Ematurga:
Family Geometridae
Subfamily Ennominae
Tribe Boarmiini
Genus Ematurga, E. amitaria

Lycaena:
Superfamily Papilionoidea
Family Lycaenidae
Subfamily Lycaeninae
Tribe Lycaenini
Genus Lycaena

Probably Lycaena hypophlaeas.

Hemileuca caterpillars, not that far from where I first encountered them many years ago

Coleoptera

Dermestidae beetle, maybe Cryptorhopalum

I think Pachybrachis is a reasonable fit (in Chrysomelidae). The best fit that’s been found in New England is Pachybrachis femoratus or “Black Pachys” which doesn’t seem to be an actual taxon.

Random note: for some reason, there’s a sub-genus called “pubescent Pachys” which is weird (https://bugguide.net/node/view/979599/bgpage).

An egg case being laid. A warty leaf beetle, Fulcadini, perhaps Neochlamisus cf eubati. Compare with the photo here: https://bugguide.net/node/view/2294569

And I think this is also Pachybrachis, but maybe a different species. But I don’t see a great match among the Massachusetts records.

Cryptocephalus cf basilis, or C. quadruplex maybe, in Chrysomelidae, mating:

Elateridae, click beetles. Anything further is a guess, but maybe Limonius cf quercinus, the Oak click beetle.

Rhagonycha, but maybe Podabrus?

Synolabus bipustulatus

Hymenoptera

Maybe Andrena mining bee:

Andrena, apparently:

Ceratina, I think. (EDIT: perhaps sub-genus Zadontomerus)

Osmia, pretty hairy as expected. “Only two submarginal cells, for one thing.”

Lovely Ichneumonid, Anamalon genus.

Lovely Dasymutilla ursus in Mutellidae, aka velvet ant.

Orthoptera

A very photogenic grasshopper. Is that a parasite/parasitoid on its face?

Melanoplus

Diptera

My first Bombyllius major (bee flies), somehow. And I caught it flying too, a terrible photo, but flying nonetheless (upper right).

These are brood parasites, and are famous for dive bombing their eggs into other insects’ nests, literally on the fly (was the pun intended? I’ll never say).

A slightly better photo at rest:

Toxomerus in Syrphidae:

iNat says Muscoidea:

Odonata

Common whitetail, Plathemis lydia.

Spiders

Phidippus, perhaps P. clarus

Maybe Phidippus too

Habronattus, Habronattus viridipes complex.

If you want to be really really optimistic, you could go to Habronattus calcaratus maddisoni, https://bugguide.net/node/view/51312, but I think that is much too fine to be a real identification.

No bugs

iNat says Silene (catchflies)

I said no bugs, but these are bug nests of some type:

Posted 2025-05-26 by gaurav1729 in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , ,

Tardigrades (and other beasts)   Leave a comment

In the past, I’ve been fooled (actually: I’ve fooled myself) into believing that I’ve found tardigrades, because I’ve wanted to find them pretty badly. This time, I’m sure, though.

I went to Moose Hill Mass Audubon and took three small samples home:

  1. Moss from a dead tree trunk
  2. Lichen attached to a piece of bark, lying on the ground
  3. Moss from the top of a medium sized rock

I added water and waited a couple of hours, then looked at them under my (rather poor quality, but excellent value for the money) Tomlov electronic microscope. Please don’t confuse this with a scanning electron microscope :-).

The first two samples were completely devoid and bereft of any animal life I could find. The third one, the moss from the top of the rock, for some reason was utterly chock full of life. It was difficult to find a field of view that didn’t have some animal or the other. I don’t understand the reason for the difference, the samples were from similar-ish samples, not far from each other. I don’t know if this is a systematic issue, but next time I go exploring, I know I’m going to definitely look at the rock moss.

We’ll get to the tardigrades, please be patient. First, a movie with a flatworm (planarian) on the lower left. There’s also a green blob on the lower right that I’m unable to identify any further than “green blob”.

Here’s a spectacularly transparent worm, which I think is some sort of Nematode worm:

Here’s another one that gives some idea of all the activity going on. There’s at least one planarian, one tardigrade (not the best view of it, though) and a bunch of other creatures that I can’t pin down.

There were a lot of good views of the tardigrades, which were very common. I’m going to just share one. It’s translucent, so you have to look a little carefully, at center-left. You can see that it’s the right size, shape, and you can see its (adorable little) lobopods (aka, legs).

More videos can be found at https://www.youtube.com/@GauravShah

Posted 2025-03-08 by gaurav1729 in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , ,